Fighting this pandemic requires sacrifice.
The very definition of the word acknowledges distaste for the choices.
Nobody likes being asked to stay at home, away from loved ones and friends, wearing a mask whenever away from the home and among others.
Events occurring in cities around Simcoe County have shone a spotlight on the seedy underbelly of life in Covid-19 imposed conditions when 100's of people chose to ignore the doctors, nurses, and researchers who have warned society of the very real threat to life that a Covid-19 infection can cause. Even with the nightly news reports about the rising death toll, filling of hospital ICU's, and potential burnout of frontline health care workers, this rebellion ... let's call it what it truly is ... is fuelled by sheer selfishness, IMHO. At the risk of insulting the intelligence of those who chose to be involved, I feel compelled to call out the magnitude of myopic disregard for others that was at the center of the gathering.
The organizers of what was advertised as protest were in fact promoting a movement, “rooted in conspiracy, pseudo-science and, more prominently, hate.” (source) with one of the main draws Saturday being People’s Party of Canada (PPC) leader Maxime Bernier. “I’m looking right now at what is happening in our country. I’m looking at what happened in communist China and I feel like I am not in Canada anymore,” said Bernier. “I’m a proud Canadian like you and we need to always fight for our freedom, because right now we cannot take our freedom for granted anymore.” Organizer Tyler Nicholson adds, “We do not support any of the mandates, because it’s illegal to force any medical practice on the populace.”Excuse me?
Mr Bernier and Mr Nicholson are neither trained medical professionals nor health field researchers. I would completely disagree with Bernier's assertion that Canada is in any, way, shape or form similar to China's communist government. How can you argue for freedom when the practice of what you label as freedom poses a very real threat to the health of your fellow Canadians that you say you're proud to be a part of. IMO, no one is forcing a medical practice on anyone else. Quite the opposite, actually, the measures are to save people from invasive medical procedures like intubation for a ventilator, the last stitch effort to save a Covid-19 infected person's life as the virus slowly destroys the CVS. The damage some suffer at the hands of the coronavirus is not open for debate or discussion! It is a well documented fact that protocols, when ignored in the guise of a protest, permit the virus to exercise its genetic programming through advancing the spread, allowing for mutations that enhance both its virility and morbidity. The recent outbreak in India is a crystal clear message to the rest of the planet of the veracity of this virus' mandate with over 300 000 new infections per day ... PER DAY!
In a recent article by Global News (source), Barrie city council penned an open letter to people who were planning on attending an in-person demonstration to protest the province-wide COVID-19 lockdown. “You are endangering the very people you think you are advocating for by making it unsafe for them to be in a public square,” council said in the letter.One point I am struggling with is the legal system's reaction to these "protests". When the stay-at-home measures were announced, special attention was granted to enhance the powers of law enforcement to deal with people who choose to ignore the edict, and since the announcement, the nightly news has included a variety of stories about fines being handed out to a wide variety of said people flouting the order. I would ask the question why an angry hoard, hiding behind some archaic and incorrectly interpreted point of law, is permitted without fines being levied. Some of the articles I have included above report that a handful of organizers have received fines, but what about the overwhelming majority? I acknowledge that it places our local constabulary in a tough spot, but they did willing accept the duties of the job when they were hired, including duties that are not pleasant. On a personal level, why can I no longer go for a buddy ride with some of my like-minded cyclists without fear of repercussions while 100's can gather, shoulder to shoulder, sans masks, to voice their displeasure at being inconvenienced ... not oppressed or persecuted ... simply inconvenienced?
The second category relates to people disliking how wearing a mask makes them feel ... Sacrifice?
The fourth category surrounds reasoning that personal freedom is paramount ... vs the Greater Good?
The fifth and deepest category is this is all part of a government conspiracy ... Seriously?